|
I personally prefer a single-box solution with a TDM400
(although I am one of the rare people who haven't had problems with the X100Ps I
have put in). My office uses an SPA-3000 on a phone line that has call forward
on busy to an iax.cc DID line, therefore I speak from experience with both types
of solutions.
Since I just happen to prefer a single box solution, I
normally recommend going with the TDM400.
In those cases where it is too inconvenient to get a
phone to the server, the SPA-3000 works just fine. I have been running this
setup for several months and it has been flawless.
So...in my opinion, its more of a matter of what is
most appropriate for your needs. If you have convenient access to a phone line,
and may expand past a single phone line, then the TDM400 makes more
sense.
-Kerry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cp Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 7:25 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ATA verse Wildcard TDM400P I fed up with X100P clone card and
want to spurge for a better solution. I do not need a router or firewall
within this device and really just need basic features. I am considering ATA
adapters such as the Sipura 3000, Cisco ATA, Grandstream
488 or a Digium Wildcard TDM400P with one FXO. Does
anyone have direct experience with both ATA’s and the TDM400P with one FXO port
they would share? Kind of Pro’s and Con’s on both solutions. You may reply off
list. I appreciate any suggestions and assistance. Thanks, Chip |
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
