I like the chan_ooh323. I like the idea of selfcontained H323 channel that doesn't rely external libraries, often with specific versions that conflict with something else.
OOH323 works "right out of box" and since we started using it to interconnect Asterisk to Samsung OfficeServ 500 we had no problems whatsoever. regards -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2005 08:11 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] h323 vs oh323 Try chan_oh323 and if it is not ok, try chan_h323 Both work well in different situations/equipments. Isamar On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Innocent Evil wrote: > Hello, > > Would you please share your experience regarding h323 and oh323 in asterisk. > I am confused to choose one. > > Thanks, > > > -- > You don't have any choice, you already made it before you came here._______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
