Do you need failover on wich side? PRI or Asterisk? Both? Straight to the last option:
PRI: the best if you have more than one PRI is to do hunt on the provider side, so when one is full or down, all calls are going to be directed to the second one. Asterisk: Do redundancy, so you need to have a second Asterisk box ready for failover, taken all the traffic of the first one in such case. You can do Hearthbeat, or DNS handling for this. I never try to run asterisk in a Cluster, that can be a third option. Any experience on that direction??? Regards, Carlos -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 8:43 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Failover Device? First, Something seems to be wrong with the list. I'm not the only person who has expressed seeing their messages either arrive late, or not at all. With that out of the way.. Is anyone aware of any type of failover device for PRI on asterisk? I've found the ISDNGuard, however it is currently not made in the U.S., nor does it run on U.S. power. Is anyone aware of a device that will detect (heartbeat?) if Asterisk is running, and if not, failover to a backup server? _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
