On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 17:43 +0100, Tamas wrote: > Hello, > > I have some ugly numbers given by zttest for ztdummy on an AMD64 box > running linux-2.6.15 compiled for Athlon64. > > linux-2.6.15, zaptel/branches/1.2 r900, jiffies > ./zttest > Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... [snip]
> --- Results after 136 passes --- > Best: 99.987793 -- Worst: 99.975586 -- Average: 99.975853 > > linux-2.6.15, zaptel/branches/1.2 r900, RTC > Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... > [snip] > --- Results after 96 passes --- > Best: 99.963379 -- Worst: 99.938965 -- Average: 99.952942 > > linux-2.6.15, zaptel/branches/1.2 r900+patch > bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5971, RTC > > Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... [snip] > --- Results after 136 passes --- > Best: 100.000000 -- Worst: 99.694824 -- Average: 99.951973 > > HW: > Tyan Tomcat K8E, Athlon64 3000+, 1GB RAM, 3ware 8006, 2x Maxtor HDD > > SW: > Ubuntu 5.10, linux-2.6.15, zaptel from 1.2 branch > > Any idea what can be wrong? What does your /proc/interrupts say? On my asterisk box, I was seeing crappy interrupt handling like this only when I was using XT-PIC interrupt handling, when I moved to IO-APIC, things got much better... Steve _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
