I believe many users would benefit from such an improvement. That's the
kind of annoyance that is usually not present in a decent PBX and that
people have the worst time getting used to (at least in my experience).
l.
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:46:35 +0100, Alex Barnes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Collins
Sent: 13 February 2006 00:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-
Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] attended call transfer
Questions for the community: is an "integrated" transfer feature
valuable to you? If so, would you be willing to put out a bounty?
(In
other words, is it just a nice feature or is it so important that
you'd
be willing to pay a few bucks for it...) Last question, but possibly
the most important: what have you done, if anything, to get around the
split between blind and attended transfers?
-MC
To get around this issue we have had to only use attended transfer with
Snom phones which are easy to train our users on.
People with DECT / ??? phones have been told to only ever use blind
(only about 10 out of 50 extensions so not the end of the world).
We would definitely chip in some money for this to happen but again it
would have be in the stable release soon as we cant deploy anything
except stable.
Cheers
Alex
--
Loway Research - Home of QueueMetrics
http://queuemetrics.loway.it
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
