On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 02:45:25PM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote: > > > Hello Armin, hello List > > > I'm trying to get chan_capi working with asterisk from debian stable > > > (asterisk 1.0.7, the debian version number is 1:1.0.7.dfsg.1-2). > > > I managed to get it compiled by providing my own version of > > > ast_copy_string. > > > > Hmm, this should be handled automatically by the config script. > > Does Debian use a patched version of Asterisk? > Probably, yes. There is a bug-report on sourceforge: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1435172&group_id=140312&atid=746578 > I'm getting exactly the same error.
Ah yes. Sorry I missed that. 0.6.4 does not check the existense of ast_copy_string(), CVS HEAD does. I will try to fix that soon. > > > Interesting is, that I receive an INFO_IND *before* the CONNECT_IND. > > > This looks like an interesting variation of Austrian ISDN to me. > > > > Maybe it is a variation of the ISDN line, but the driver should fix that. > > Sending INFO_IND with a call-reference (PLCI) which is assigned by > > CONNECT_IND later, is just an error of the isdn driver. > You mean, the capi part of misdn? Should I report a bug against mISDN? Yes. Maybe it is already fixed in mISDN and you have an older version? > > If you use mISDN, why don't you use chan_misdn? > How reliable is that? Any experience? I don't have any experience with mISDN. I just noticed the big work going on with mISDN and I assume that the support is good. Armin _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
