Heh - yeah, I was just curious myself after your remark and chased it
up and thought you might find it interesting since you had raised it
*shrug*
Martin Joseph wrote:
On Mar 13, 2006, at 12:12 AM, Adrian Carter wrote:
BTW.. without sparking a flame war, and I have no idea
how
accurate the information is, but it seems that 'single party consent'
applies as long as the recorded is not to be used for illegal purposes.
This means only one party (in this case the business) need consent to
the recordings for them to be legal. I imagine the company therefore
gives itself approval to record all its calls, and thus, its all legal.
*shrug* IANAL, and I dont know how accurate the information is, since
it was a curiosity google search and comes from a company marketing
software to accomplish it.. .. but it seems fairly factual and similar
to my understanding of other jurisdictions laws
From:
http://www.callcorder.com/phone-recording-law.htm
Thanks for the Off Topic info ;~)
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
Adrian Carter
Technical Manager
Leading Edge Internet
Web http://www.lei.net.au http://support.lei.net.au
Direct +61 2 6163 6162 Support 1 300 662 415
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Adrian Carter
Technical Manager
Leading Edge Internet
Web http://www.lei.net.au http://support.lei.net.au
Direct +61 2 6163 6162 Support 1 300 662 415
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
