I still don't understand why you can't just bind to 0.0.0.0 which means "all interfeces". What problem does that cause?
--- Asterisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The problem should be easy enough to solve for someone who knows the > internal guts. As a matter of fact, this is very important to > resolve. > Asterisk behind firewall is trouble and that is known already. So I > decided to use the same linux box as firewall, meaning I need atleast > two NICs. I wonder how others are solving this issue. I refuse to > believe that no one faced similar problems cause there is no other > way > for a beginner to plant an Asterisk box but have two NICs or go > through > the NAT troubles. Moreover, there are news posts all over about SIP > phones meaning others are connecting more than one NICs. Wonder why > they > don't have similar issue. I am sure that there are more out there who > are facing similar problems so people who have solved this, please > speak > up and help us all. > > Thanks in advance. > Ricky > ===== Chris Albertson Home: 310-376-1029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 310-990-7550 Office: 310-336-5189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] KG6OMK __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/ _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
