I'm not the original poster, but it certainly sounds like an underlying OS config issue and not an asterisk issue. I'd bet a small amount of money on multiple default gateways and/or associated routing issues.
------------------------ > I still don't understand why you can't just bind to > 0.0.0.0 which means "all interfeces". What problem does > that cause? > > > --- Asterisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > The problem should be easy enough to solve for someone who knows the > > internal guts. As a matter of fact, this is very important to > > resolve. > > Asterisk behind firewall is trouble and that is known already. So I > > decided to use the same linux box as firewall, meaning I need atleast > > two NICs. I wonder how others are solving this issue. I refuse to > > believe that no one faced similar problems cause there is no other > > way > > for a beginner to plant an Asterisk box but have two NICs or go > > through > > the NAT troubles. Moreover, there are news posts all over about SIP > > phones meaning others are connecting more than one NICs. Wonder why > > they > > don't have similar issue. I am sure that there are more out there who > > are facing similar problems so people who have solved this, please > > speak > > up and help us all. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > Ricky > > > > ===== > Chris Albertson > Home: 310-376-1029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cell: 310-990-7550 > Office: 310-336-5189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > KG6OMK > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears > http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/ > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ---------------End of Original Message----------------- _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
