On 5/15/06 10:24 PM, "Steve Feinstein" wisely said: > I haven't thought it through really, so if it's a bad idea please let > me know. But I think a named pipe would be a good unix-y way to do this. > > -Steve Feinstein > > A.J. Paxson wrote: >> Hi All! >> >> I've really been struggling trying to get around this. Instead of the same >> announcement being played over and over again, I want to be able to play >> more than 1 announcement in a queue. >> >> Does anyone have any brainstorming ideas on how I can try this? >> >> Once a caller is in a queue, I no longer have any control inside that queue. >> I can have that queue timeout, play a different announcement, and place them >> back in the queue, but then the caller loses it's place. >> >> Any ideas? >> >> ~~Aaron >> >> _______________________________________________ >> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- >> >> Asterisk-Users mailing list >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >> > > Thanks for the reply, Steve!
How so? I understand what you mean by named pipes, but not sure how to use it in this context. Care to give a pseudo example of what you are thinking? _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
