In my very limited testing of native, each channel was receiving a
different stream (each caller heard something different). Under a high
volume of calls, which is going to hurt performance more? Transcoding
MP3s but sending a single stream or separate streams per call under
native?
When I say high, I mean 1,000+ calls.
Thanks,
Steve
Erick Perez wrote:
Thanks to all. Native format will be.
On 5/27/06, Matt Riddell (IT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vahan Yerkanian wrote:
> Erick Perez wrote:
>> should I use mpg123 with asterisk 1.2.7 or should i use the native
>> player asterisk has?
>> the target machine will receive heavy load.
>
> mpg123 was used back when asterisk didn't have native format
support. If
> you are expecting heavy load, the native format is the way to go. You
> might decide not to use mp3 format at all, recompressing your MoH
files
> using sox to the formats you gonna use, such as .al, .ul, .gsm, or
leave
> it at .sln to cut the decoding leg only.
Heh, damn this GPRS connection. In order to pass the time while
downloading messages I reply before they are all in, and yet by the time
I have received all the messages I note that your question has already
been answered!
:)
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
_______________________________________________
http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
