> > > > If your comments echo those of past conversations on the matter I can > > see that a bounty at this point would not be money well spent, since any > > work the comes from it is not likely to make the cut. A bounty would > > only be useful to accelerate the implementation of a feature where there > > is widespread agreement on what the architecture should be. > > > > A bounty for what? A bounty for implement a SIP only functionality? I > would agree that this is likely money not well spent. If you're > proposing a bounty for it to be a core-driven functionality, I do > think that would be money well spent. >
Money well spent, but too much of it, I doubt anyone would contribute enough to get to that point, that is a major overhaul and a huge can of bugs. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
