On Monday 05 June 2006 11:12, trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote: > Well it may be it maybe not, I wouldnt call people liars without proof > however. What I will do is state that I have written a tool that allows
Fair enough. > That may be, which goes with what he said that you said was a faery > tale. So which is it, faery tale or fact? You seem to be inconsistant. How am I being inconsistent? > And if he could have made a case that he needed it changed, wouldnt that > negate your argument that the patent holders wont let digium change it > more than once? Is iut the patent holders (or their authorized agent > sipro.com as the case may be) or digium that has the discretion? I didn't say that the patent holder won't let Digium change it more than once. I believe I said something along the lines of "without good reason" which is a statement I stand by. As far who has the discretion... I do not know. I assume (yes, a dangerous passtime) that somewhere within the Digium/sipro agreement there is the understanding that Digium will make some effort to prevent abuse of the system. > I cant speak for you hitting your kids when they bother you for 5 > minutes, however if it bothers you that people post 'I had a problem > with digium' email and your explanation contradicts itself, even your > claim that someone is being less than honest when you yourself state > later that they were being honest seems dubious at best. Again, where is my inconsistency? You seem like a bright enough lad to identify a sarcastic and exaggerated example (so much so that you turn it into a thinly veiled personal attack on my parenting skills), so please show me where I'm inconsistent. -A. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
