shadowym wrote:
The cold hard truth is that if Asterisk cannot achieve 99.999% uptime
without becoming much more expensive that a traditional PBX then it is not a
viable alternative. Even elcheapo Key systems are rated for five nines.
Even massive redundant public exchanges struggle for 99.999% up time. No
key system gives that. Its about 1 hour down in 10 years.
That is what the telco world requires unless your just using Asterisk in
your basement as a hobby or as a one man company.
Redundant Servers is moving into the realm of non-competitive with
Traditional PBX IMHO.
A traditional PBX of any decent size is highly redundant. More so than
you will easily achieve with *. How do you expect * to achieve high
reliability without redundant servers.
I don't care about corruption of the CDR or any of the logging/database
information. All I care about is the ability make phone calls after power
failure. That IS the MAIN function of a PBX. Not call centers, databases,
CDR, click 2 call, and all the other bells and whistles.
Steve
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
