Hi,
trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
yes and I suggested that however, MOS is an opinion, so its totally
subjective and not based on anything 'real'. That was kinda my point
earlier. Personally I think that its better to isolate the network/cpu
issues and correct them to get what a given implementation of a codec is
supposed to be rated at (ideally the two would be intertwined).
Technically you are right, but its difficult to communicate that in the
market. Using 'accepted' methods like MOS (or variations thereof) makes
discussions with other parties a lot easier.
The work that you have done so far is a great step towards a product
that many people might find useful. In a nutshell the concept I am
thinking about is a tool that you drop onto your network and it will
monitor the data (presumably not just iax but sip, h.323, whatever) and
generate live stats of the call and possibly even have an alarm system
that would send off a page or something if conditions get too far from
'normal'.
Yes, that would be excellent indeed. Problem is that the location of
measurement will influence the scoring :) If you have good ideas towards
this we'd be very interested in participating.
Florian
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
