I would be happy to do so for the advantages of G723.1. i.e. great sounding calls at a very low bandwidth. I suspect that the cost of running the data over the PCI bus multiple times would be more than offset by the faster compression/decompression provided by the DSP.
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 10:41, Jeremy McNamara wrote: > Eric Wieling wrote: > > >The makers of hardphones prolly get their G72x licensing by using a DSP > >that already has a license. The DSP can't be that expensive. I wish > >someone would make a PCI card with something like 8 of these chips on it > >and sell it cheap. Should be pretty easy to build a codec for Asterisk > >that uses the DSP card. > > > > > > So you want to deal with the latency involved in two PCI bus > transits? Asterisk doesn't need a old skewl DSP. > > > Jeremy McNamara > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Sample configs, scripts, more : http://www.fnords.org/~eric/asterisk/ BTEL Consulting 504-899-1387 or 850-484-4545 or 877-677-9643 _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
