Just for the heck of it, if we would get a g723.1 license and trade it roughly at the price of current g729, hoe many people would be interested in getting that ?
On Monday 03 November 2003 17:13, Eric Wieling wrote: > I would be happy to do so for the advantages of G723.1. i.e. great > sounding calls at a very low bandwidth. I suspect that the cost of > running the data over the PCI bus multiple times would be more than > offset by the faster compression/decompression provided by the DSP. > > On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 10:41, Jeremy McNamara wrote: > > Eric Wieling wrote: > > >The makers of hardphones prolly get their G72x licensing by using a DSP > > >that already has a license. The DSP can't be that expensive. I wish > > >someone would make a PCI card with something like 8 of these chips on it > > >and sell it cheap. Should be pretty easy to build a codec for Asterisk > > >that uses the DSP card. > > > > So you want to deal with the latency involved in two PCI bus > > transits? Asterisk doesn't need a old skewl DSP. > > > > > > Jeremy McNamara > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Michael Bielicki Managing Director TAAN Consultants Ltd http://www.global-gateway.net/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This correspondence is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information or both. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this correspondence in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or rely on any part of this correspondence if you are not the intended recipient. Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
