--- William Waites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > > That only true for some NAT implementations and configurations. > It is not robust in general. It would require double the ipfilter > configuration and double the traffic on my NetBSD gateway, for > example. The patch I submitted last week addresses this problem.
Did your patch make it to CVS? Sorry for being lazy and not looking. >From the sounds of thing maybe only half the patch made it But I'm not at the right machine to look at present. ===== Chris Albertson Home: 310-376-1029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 310-990-7550 Office: 310-336-5189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] KG6OMK __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
