On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 16:27, Alastair Maw wrote: > On 03/11/03 20:03, Steven Critchfield wrote: > > > Sounds like you really need a C programmer and get into the guts > > of asterisk. Can't get more flexible than having the source code > > yourself to do anything you want. You could add your DSP routines into > > the dsp.c file and call them when needed. You can also write a asterisk > > application and have direct access to all the audio in every direction > > just as you want it. > > But C isn't as maintainable as nice Java apps, and it's as simple as > that. Basically, I'm after the most powerful interface possible to > Asterisk, but trying to make it as friendly as possible to code things > against. As far as our organization is concerned, that pretty much means > Java objects.
So you bought that line of Marketecture didn't you. I think there are several large open source projects that prove that C is maintainable. Maintainability is really a function of organization. If you can't be organized, you will not produce very maintainable C code. I'll point out that I am not a C programmer, but making patches to asterisk isn't that difficult. I have also made patches to the kernel without too much hair pulling. -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
