Douglas Garstang wrote:
Would you like me to dig up the posts from Keving Fleming stating that this is known not to work Brian?
As I recall those posts have to do with the way your particular setup required ARA to work with a failover/redundant cluster system you were building.
Beyond that I'm not really interested in getting into a pissing contest. I have ONE SQL table called "extensions_table" on ONE SQL server, but have maybe 20 SIP phones using that same database, placing calls from 10-12 separate Asterisk instances.
I was calling into question your presenting a "well-known fact" that appears to be incorrect. If Kevin sees this and wants to chime in to support your statement and tell me that my experience is somehow an illusion, he's certainly welcome to do so. I have experienced the taste of crow, and eat it when needed. You?
Can certain situations be construed where ARA will not do exactly what the administrator wants? Apparently, from reading some of your posts, true.
Can multiple Asterisk servers be set up to use a single database instance to store common configuration information? Certainly true, from my and many other people's experiences.
The thrust of my post was to refute the "fact," and to suggest you perhaps adopt a little less inflammatory rhetoric when you post to this list.
B. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
