Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:42:36AM -0500, Rich Adamson wrote:
Tomislav Parčina wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
I did "yum update" last week and here is my current kernel:
I had no problem at all with zaptel. I am only using TDM400P though, in
case that matters.
Hi Anto!
The thing is that I can't rely on yum update for asterisk installation. I
would like something that will work like this: I install FC5 from CD/DVD,
install RPM's that I need from my ftp server or from CD, install zaptel,
libpri, asterisk...
So, I need to download rpm's that will allow me to install
zaptel/libpri/asterisk without using yum update (I need to make all
installations the same).
Why bother with the rpm's?
Because you have some other programs on your system other than Asterisk.
And because you want a reproducable build.
Guess that depends a lot on personal objectives, styles, and whether
asterisk code has been modified locally. Once the reproducable build is
operational and one has to maintain the code, reproducable builds sort
of go out the window (eg, customer/system A has a problem, but not
customer B through Z).
Using the Branch SVN checkout approach always provides the most up to
date code as opposed to replicating buggy stuff via rpms.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
