That is incorrect. It works just fine through NAT providing:
- The server is proxying RTP as it has no support for STUN etc.
- The NAT is the basic domestic router style, not a full blown firewall requiring port mappings
Simon
On 8/24/06, Andreas Sikkema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone here use the Nokia E61 ? I am looking to invest in a
> wifi phone and I want to get the best. Is it good as far as
> reception ? That is of most importance to me. Thanks.
I've tried it in the last couple of days. The biggest issue for
me ist that it HAS to be on the same side of a NAT as the
server it talks to (asterisk, ser, etc). If it is on the
private side of a NAT and the server is on the public side, it
doesn't work. I've read something on the Nokia forums that
Nokia is aware of the problem and it will be solved.
My problem is that they want to solve this using STUN etc,
while I would prefer they also wouldn't have the software
care if it is on the inside of a NAT like most other CPE's
so our platform can take care of things.
--
Andreas Sikkema BBeyond
Software Engineer Planeetbaan 4
+31 (0)23 7074342 2132 HZ Hoofddorp
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
