Kevin Smith wrote:
Dialing a number and transferring a number are two different things.
And no offense, you are not really providing a lot of details along
with your problem. So you can dial the numbers but not transfer from
one to the other.
I was not thinking that it would be too much difference. Therefore I
also do not know what more info could help to distinguish the problem. I
hardly can post my entire configuration.
What does the CLI say when you try the transfer? That would provide a
lot of information that could clue you in to what is going on.
You hit another problem with that. I hardly see here anything anymore.
The messages fly by so fast, .... Especially annoying messages:
chan_sip.c:10888 handle_request_register: Registration from
'<sip:192.168.250.20>' failed for '192.168.250.244' - Username/auth name
mismatch
-- Got SIP response 486 "Busy Here" back from 192.168.250.244
-- Got SIP response 400 "Bad Request" back from xx.xx.xx.126
NOTICE[5936]: chan_sip.c:9600 handle_response_register: Failed to
authenticate on REGISTER to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' (Tries 3)
.....
It would be nice to "filter" the CLI for such investigation for a moment.
What type of phones are you using? Some phones have the ability to
pattern match and wait for a certain number of seconds before sending
the number to asterisk. For example. On our Polycom phones a user has
3 seconds (between digits) to enter in 10 digits. This could be where
most of your problem is.
That is a very good point and I will contact the manufacturer of these
no-name phones.
My guess the problem lies with the Phones, not Asterisk form the
information you provided.
I disagree with that! Why Asterisk treats dialing and transfer
different. That makes not really sense, does it?
bye
Ronald
Kevin
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
David Gagnon wrote:
Ronald,
You seem to be a little bit angry about VoIP. If so, I could give
you my old Nortel system. Does this would make you happy?
David
David,
I am not angry about VoIP, but please send my your old Nortel system
!!!!!
I just do not understand why I can DIAL 601 and 6014, but not use
blind transfer. Is the question too difficult?
I am sure there is somewhere a switch to say, wait two seconds (as
for dialing) before you assume it is a complete number.
It is also strange that snom phone can do it correct, because it uses
the ok key.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald
Wiplinger
Envoyé : 2 septembre 2006 04:20
À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
Anthony Rodgers wrote:
With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan......
This answer is therefore totally nonsense !!! (With all respect!!!)
Both answers have actually not lead to any step further, but to more
messages. I use to refer to such answers as NON-ANSWERS.
Please only reply if and really only if you know a solution for the
problem! Thanks for your understanding.
bye
Ronald - again, I am not angry at all.
WHERE do you see a problem in the numbering plan?????
I see the problem in ASTERISK, because it does not wait for the last
digit!!!
Where can I set that it waits for it?
The beauty on voip IS that you can have different length and
overlapping, ....
bye
Ronald
CP
On 1-Sep-06, at 10:37 PM, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
I found a problem in blind transfer:
I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 !!!!
If I get a call on 615 (snom) and transfer to 6014 it works, since
snom
requires me to hit "ok"
If I get a call on 601 and transfer to 6014, than 601 will get the
busy
signal and I hang up as usually with transfer.
Howerver the caller get the announcements: I could not get that, ....
What could be the problem ?
bye
Ronald
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
