Are you using # to transfer? If so, it's not sending it as a new call, it's just sending asterisk digits using whatever DTMF mode. Asterisk parses these based on a "first match" in the dialplan. Make sure that the longer extension numbers are loaded first in the dialplan.
-Tim On September 2, 2006 20:12, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: > Kevin Smith wrote: > > Dialing a number and transferring a number are two different things. > > And no offense, you are not really providing a lot of details along > > with your problem. So you can dial the numbers but not transfer from > > one to the other. > > I was not thinking that it would be too much difference. Therefore I > also do not know what more info could help to distinguish the problem. I > hardly can post my entire configuration. > > > What does the CLI say when you try the transfer? That would provide a > > lot of information that could clue you in to what is going on. > > You hit another problem with that. I hardly see here anything anymore. > The messages fly by so fast, .... Especially annoying messages: > chan_sip.c:10888 handle_request_register: Registration from > '<sip:192.168.250.20>' failed for '192.168.250.244' - Username/auth name > mismatch > -- Got SIP response 486 "Busy Here" back from 192.168.250.244 > -- Got SIP response 400 "Bad Request" back from xx.xx.xx.126 > NOTICE[5936]: chan_sip.c:9600 handle_response_register: Failed to > authenticate on REGISTER to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' (Tries 3) > ..... > > It would be nice to "filter" the CLI for such investigation for a moment. > > > What type of phones are you using? Some phones have the ability to > > pattern match and wait for a certain number of seconds before sending > > the number to asterisk. For example. On our Polycom phones a user has > > 3 seconds (between digits) to enter in 10 digits. This could be where > > most of your problem is. > > That is a very good point and I will contact the manufacturer of these > no-name phones. > > > My guess the problem lies with the Phones, not Asterisk form the > > information you provided. > > I disagree with that! Why Asterisk treats dialing and transfer > different. That makes not really sense, does it? > > bye > > Ronald > > > Kevin > > > > Ronald Wiplinger wrote: > >> David Gagnon wrote: > >>> Ronald, > >>> > >>> You seem to be a little bit angry about VoIP. If so, I could give > >>> you my old Nortel system. Does this would make you happy? > >>> > >>> David > >> > >> David, > >> > >> I am not angry about VoIP, but please send my your old Nortel system > >> !!!!! > >> > >> I just do not understand why I can DIAL 601 and 6014, but not use > >> blind transfer. Is the question too difficult? > >> > >> I am sure there is somewhere a switch to say, wait two seconds (as > >> for dialing) before you assume it is a complete number. > >> It is also strange that snom phone can do it correct, because it uses > >> the ok key. > >> > >>> -----Message d'origine----- > >>> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald > >>> Wiplinger > >>> Envoyé : 2 septembre 2006 04:20 > >>> À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > >>> Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits > >>> > >>> Anthony Rodgers wrote: > >>>> With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan...... > >> > >> This answer is therefore totally nonsense !!! (With all respect!!!) > >> > >> > >> Both answers have actually not lead to any step further, but to more > >> messages. I use to refer to such answers as NON-ANSWERS. > >> Please only reply if and really only if you know a solution for the > >> problem! Thanks for your understanding. > >> > >> bye > >> > >> Ronald - again, I am not angry at all. > >> > >>> WHERE do you see a problem in the numbering plan????? > >>> I see the problem in ASTERISK, because it does not wait for the last > >>> digit!!! > >>> Where can I set that it waits for it? > >>> > >>> The beauty on voip IS that you can have different length and > >>> overlapping, .... > >>> > >>> bye > >>> > >>> Ronald > >>> > >>>> CP > >>>> > >>>> On 1-Sep-06, at 10:37 PM, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: > >>>>> I found a problem in blind transfer: > >>>>> > >>>>> I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 !!!! > >>>>> > >>>>> If I get a call on 615 (snom) and transfer to 6014 it works, since > >>>>> snom > >>>>> requires me to hit "ok" > >>>>> > >>>>> If I get a call on 601 and transfer to 6014, than 601 will get the > >>>>> busy > >>>>> signal and I hang up as usually with transfer. > >>>>> Howerver the caller get the announcements: I could not get that, .... > >>>>> > >>>>> What could be the problem ? > >>>>> > >>>>> bye > >>>>> > >>>>> Ronald > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Tim St. Pierre IP telephony specialist sip://[EMAIL PROTECTED] Toronto: 647 722 6930 Toll-Free 1 888 488 6940 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpy80N6wIb40.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
