I think that limit was increased in 1.6.6 or
1.6.7.
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tue 10/10/2006 6:57 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc:
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to
the "asterisk-users" mailing list
> What I don't understand is why people
MUST use the 2.0.x firmware.
I believe it's because the limit of how many
can be monitored at once,
someone correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> Jessee J Holmes wrote:
> > A few of our technical support
staff here at Atacomm are currently
> > working on this issue with
Polycom, Digium and one of our customer's
> > (who posted in here earlier this
week).
> >
> > There are some major differences
from the 1.x.x firmware and the 2.01
> > firmware. Obviously, many on here,
voip-info.org, and all over the
> > Internet have reported troubles
where their presence feature that stops
> > working after they upgrade their
Polycom phones to firmware revision
> > 2.0.1 when the phones are
configured with an Asterisk system. A couple
> > new things have been added to the
.cfg files that MUST now be set in
> > order for presence to work again
with an Asterisk system.
> >
> > In the sip.cfg file:
> >
> > feature feature.1.name="presence"
feature.1.enabled="1"
> >
> > In the phone[mac].cfg file:
> >
> > <attendant
attendant.uri="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" attendant.reg=""/>
> >
> >
> > However, there are still confirmed
problems with this setup (i.e. LEDs
> > not working), which Polycom and
ourselves are currently testing in our
> > labs trying to fix. The reasoning
for this is Digium doesn't seem to
> > follow the "standards" for
presence support and are currently working to
> > change this functionality within
Asterisk. Polycom designed their
> > phones, and specifically their
firmware, to work with the "standards"
> > (more specifically, the Microsoft
LCS - Live Communications Server).
> >
> > This issue has been reported on
multiple instances to Polycom, Digium,
> > and ourselves; but, no real
resolution is completed yet. We'll continue
> > working on this issue within our
labs and post an official answer when
> > one is available.
> >
> > Sorry for the bit of bad news, if
anyone is willing to contribute
> > working / half working code, we'd
be more than happy to look at it and
> > work with Polycom and Digium on
getting this fixed for everyone AS
>
_______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options
visit:
>
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options
visit:
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
--
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
