There is no problem with the CPU utilization, it is around 40%, I will not be able to try this without the VPN, maybe I should try another VPN solution like OpenSwan, or PPTP.
Why do you think that IAX will make a difference than SIP? On 1/16/07, Gordon Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, O.Kamal wrote: > I am trying to connect 2 asterisk servers through OpenVPN, the VPN should > carry 16 channel, however when active channels reached 4 concurrent > channels, the connection became unstable, with a very high latency (around > 900ms), the internet bandwidth is 1Mbps on each server, I have upgraded the > bandwidth to double it, but still have exactly the same problem. > > Any tips or recommendations on such setup? No real answers, but questions that might help ... Have you tried it without using OpenVPN? Just port-forward the SIP & RTP ports, if you need to and give it a go. > I am using SIP and G729 between the 2 servers, openVPN using UDP with no > compression. Why not IAX? Are your openVPN end-points up to it? Doing high-grade encryption in software might challenge some slower processors - are the VPN endpoints the asterisk boxes themselves? Gordon _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users