On 27 Jan 2007, at 16:33, Lee Jenkins wrote:

Although I wouldn't complain about a free G.729 codec, I have to be honest in saying that $10.00 isn't that great of an expense considering the better call quality you get.

Does G.729 work by pushing up the compression, therefore moving from work from the Network to the CPU ? Across my LAN, I'd probably be able to handle *fewer*, rather than more calls across my * exchange if this was the case. If it's cleverer that this, I think I'll have to speculate a few dollars, assuming my Snoms can talk in G.729.

cheers
-a

--
Regards, Andy Davidson
http://www.devonshire.it/  -  0844 704 704 7  - Sheffield, UK


_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to