Michael Collins wrote: >> Of course, you should take this with a grain of salt since I tried [EMAIL >> PROTECTED] >> (now TrixBox) for a total of 2 weeks before gutting it. Now, I just > use >> my own GUI for everything from graphical setup to scripting. >> > > There is nothing wrong with starting out with Trixbox. I still use it > because I like the Linux distro (CentOS) and I like the fact that it > sets up lots of stuff that I don't have to bother with. I used Trixbox > to learn a lot about how to use Asterisk, then I went back and did a > clean install on a separate machine to learn about setting up and > installing Asterisk. For me, having a working system first, playing > with it, breaking it, etc. was very useful because it gave me > perspective when setting up a system from scratch. Now I actually have > two systems to play with: one Trixbox and one scratch * install. (I get > the best of both worlds, but I have nothing in production just yet. > I'll decide later which way to go once I'm doing playing with my two > 'sandboxes.')
This is a fair statement, unless you can't get Trixbox working in the first place. -Stephen- _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
