This guy could save his brain cells by just getting his "shining good 'ol voip pabx box" interface directly with the "existing pabx" of his client.
I just wonder what is the brand name of that existing pabx? > Gordon Henderson wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> What is the main purpose of this setup by the way? >> >> For me? To provde a client with a VoIP capable PBX in their office to >> replace their current steam driven PBX... >> >> (And hopefully to earn a few ££in the process!) >> >> I have a lot of installations now with pure analogue lines, now want >> to do one with a digital line, but I want to test it out before going >> on-site, so I don't look like an idiot when it doesn't work... >> >> Gordon > You should be in for a treat then. Digital is much easier IMO than > analog setups. > > I have not touched an analog setup recently (about a year) but unless > things have changed alot in echo cancellation and analog, that is what I > spent most of my time doing, chasing intermittent echo. I have yet to > experience this with digital. Not to say I have never encountered echo, > I have, but after adjusted the echo is gone. > > Also, there is a certain thrill to watch 30 channels come up one after > another in rapid succession. > > Thanks, > Steve Totaro > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
