OpenVPN is a great choice. It is it's own standard, it does not need a RFC, and it is not really complicated at all.
Find a good OpenVPN howto (skip the manual for now). It will take you step by step on how to setup a tunnel. Once you have your tunnel up, start reading the manual (if you care to). The abundance of Howtos on OpenVPN cover all sorts of configurations. You can just have two boxes with a VPN connection or you can even bridge two physically separate LANs over a WAN link into one subnet or even do routing. Start with the Howtos. Most are clear and concise, step by step. The manual is a little steeper as far as the learning curve goes, so I say, setup your OpenVPN tunnel first, then read the manual since it will make alot more sense then. Thanks, Steve Totaro Kate Kretz wrote: > OpenVPN is very good in NAT (if one of your boxes is behind NAT). > otherwise, OpenVPN seems to be a bad choice, it's complicated, > non-standard (there'n no RFC on OpenVPN). > > On 8/10/07, *MOSBAH ABDELKADER* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Hello, > > Is the OpenVPN the ideal solution to set a tunnel between two > asterisk servers or there is a better solution. > > Thanks. > > <http://www.api-digital.com--> > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
