Dovid B wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tilghman Lesher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 8:21 PM > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] sangoma zaptel patches > > > >> On Sunday 11 November 2007 11:07:04 Steve Totaro wrote: >> >>> Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >>> >>>> Sangoma's s setup process includes a small patch to Zaptel. I have some >>>> technical reservations with that patch. It seems that under certain >>>> circumstances it may cause unexpected behavior when used with other >>>> Zaptel channel drivers. I also don't understand why a safer method is >>>> not used. >>>> >>> Just out of curiosity, I have yet to see any issues with Sangoma cards >>> and the way they ride on top (and patch) the Zaptel drivers. This >>> personal dataset is around one hundred productions boxes. >>> >> How many of those boxes are of the type that Tzafrir is worried about? >> Specifically, how many of those boxes contain a combination of telephony >> hardware from vendors other than Sangoma? >> >> > > I have a box that now has a TDM400P. I will be installing a sangoma card in > it soon and I actually need support for this. > > > I set up almost the exact same configuration and all went well (HP DL380). No gotchas or glitches.
I have a feeling that Tzafrir is trying to fix what is not broken, since he never pointed out a single conflict between various hardware using patched Zaptel drivers configurations. Maybe he is looking down the road and being proactive which I applaud, but I think he is obsessing over what he feels is the "incorrect" way of doing things and demanding (tone in emails) that they cooperate and do what he tells them. A little tact goes a long way. Thanks, Steve _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
