So you'd be making 100 connections/minute, which is pretty relentless. That's like five connections, five requests sent, five responses received, and five disconnects, /every/ three seconds.
And the likelihood of all 100 users to be spread out evenly over a minute doesn't seem very high. I think your box would be pretty busy with that. Astmanproxy would be indicated. Moj Anthony Chapellier wrote: > However I wanted to get periodic infos about queued users (position in > queue) only. So I thought I could make a program sending periodic > requests to asterisk manager. Is it really bad to bother asterisk > manager with frequently and periodic requests sent by mutiple users (we > could say maybe 100 users with a request every minute) ? > > Moises Silva a écrit : > >> Yes, but you should use astmanproxy instead and don't bother Asterisk >> with multiple manager connections. >> >> On Nov 27, 2007 8:24 AM, Anthony Chapellier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Does Asterisk manager allow multiple clients to connect to an Asterisk >>> instance using the same user account ? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- >>> >>> asterisk-users mailing list >>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
