On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Mojo with Horan & Company, LLC wrote: > If each client connected only once, subsequently made a request every > minute, and then disconnected only when finished, the load might be more > reasonable. It can be a little harder to write that kind of client > though :) >> >> Anthony Chapellier wrote: >> >>> However I wanted to get periodic infos about queued users (position in >>> queue) only. So I thought I could make a program sending periodic >>> requests to asterisk manager. Is it really bad to bother asterisk >>> manager with frequently and periodic requests sent by mutiple users (we >>> could say maybe 100 users with a request every minute) ?
How about a single daemon that collects the information from Asterisk and stuffs it into a shared memory segment. The cost of each client attaching (shmat()) to the segment would be trivial. Thanks in advance, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Steve Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000 _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
