17 dec 2007 kl. 15.26 skrev Tony Plack: >> - Not enough reasons to upgrade, since 1.2 really works well - Just >> a bad karma for 1.4 > > Funny, but my results have been different. I was running on 1.2.17 > (and on to 22) for a year and had all sorts of lockups. For me, > when I switched to 1.4.5 these things went away. > > I did find some bugs and switched to branch/1.4 in SVN. While some > have considered this bleeding edge, I figure since there is no NEW > code development, these are all bug fixes. So far, I have yet to > find something that broke since I polled SVN every week. I do > review the changes and implement as needed. I have yet to have a > major problem with the server that was not caused because of my > config. > > Our site might be small in number of connections in real time, but > it is much more stable since 1.4 > > I think if you polled the 1.2 community, not everyone is running > 1.2.25. I think that the bugs you know are the bugs you love. I > don't know if it is just 1.4 but I think that anything past version > 1.2.X is considered dangerous. I also wonder if because 1.2 had > such success, that there are many who use this code who are not > programmers and have trouble diagnosing Open Source bugs. Not that > they need to be, but if that were me, it would change my opinion of > the code and the support given if I didn't know how to debug a C > program. Just some thoughts. > > Thanks to the team for their hard work on 1.4. My experience with > 1.4 makes me hunger for 1.6 a short time after release.
Please observer that this man was not bribed by the Asterisk Developer Team :-) Thanks a lot! More postive and negative feedback is appreciated. /O _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
