Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> 
> Well, there is not enough data to suggest that. Before blaming Ira for
> being such a cheap fellow (after all, he didn't buy one of those IBM big
> iorns to run Asterisk on) we should also consider that the upgrade to
> 1.4 probably also involved an upgrade of Zaptel, which *is* kernel
> space.
> 
Does that make someone cheap? My callweaver test system is running on a 
S/H big heavy IBM server (with redundant PSU, hotswapable, RAID etc.).

Admittedly it was very competatively priced.

_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to