Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > Well, there is not enough data to suggest that. Before blaming Ira for > being such a cheap fellow (after all, he didn't buy one of those IBM big > iorns to run Asterisk on) we should also consider that the upgrade to > 1.4 probably also involved an upgrade of Zaptel, which *is* kernel > space. > Does that make someone cheap? My callweaver test system is running on a S/H big heavy IBM server (with redundant PSU, hotswapable, RAID etc.).
Admittedly it was very competatively priced. _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users