Thomas Kenyon wrote: > Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > >> Well, there is not enough data to suggest that. Before blaming Ira for >> being such a cheap fellow (after all, he didn't buy one of those IBM big >> iorns to run Asterisk on) we should also consider that the upgrade to >> 1.4 probably also involved an upgrade of Zaptel, which *is* kernel >> space. >> >> > Does that make someone cheap? My callweaver test system is running on a > S/H big heavy IBM server (with redundant PSU, hotswapable, RAID etc.). > > Admittedly it was very competatively priced. > Cheap, Frugal, Price Savvy, all may be labels for calling someone cheap. I call it sound fiscal policy providing what you use suits your needs and does not cost you more in the long run.
I have even seen an Emachine running a somewhat busy PBX with over year's uptime. I would call that a gamble but certainly it has paid off for them. Thanks, Steve Totaro _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users