> > Asterisk 1.6 includes a new feature that allows using AMI as a transport > > for AGI commands, there abstraction becomes even more important. > > For Asterisk-Java I am currently adding support for that in a way that > > allows the developer to run the same "AGI" code either through FastAGI > > or AMI without knowing about the underlying details. > > Where is more information on this new feature for Asterisk 1.6? Any details?
I wrote this blog entry when I was writing the AsyncAGI feature: http://www.moythreads.com/wordpress/2007/12/24/asterisk-asynchronous-agi/ This is the bug entry: http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11282 I changed my mind regarding the behavior of this feature after opening the bug entry, so the initial description of the bug can be confusing and totally different from the final implementation and behavior, so you will have to read all the comments in the bug entry to understand what is this about. Moisés Silva -- "I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." Voltaire _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
