On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 11:36:03AM -0500, sean darcy wrote:
> Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> ...........................
> > The messages in bug 12099 are *not* errors, they are annoyances only.
> > The latest SVN branch 1.4 code of Asterisk will no longer generate them,
> 
> Using today's svn 3915:
> 
> ..........................
>   Answer("Zap/2-1", "") in new stack
>      -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2] Dial("Zap/2-1", "Zap/4/2375678") 
> in new stack
>      -- Called 4/2375678
> [Mar  2 11:15:35] WARNING[2320]: chan_zap.c:4424 zt_handle_event: 
> Detected alarm on channel 4: Red Alarm
>      -- Hungup 'Zap/4-1'
>    == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1)
>      -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3] Congestion("Zap/2-1", "") in new 
> stack
> [Mar  2 11:15:35] NOTICE[2320]: chan_zap.c:7514 handle_init_event: Alarm 
> cleared on channel 4
>    == Spawn extension (internal, 2375678, 3) exited non-zero on 'Zap/2-1'
>      -- Hungup 'Zap/2-1'
> 
> zap show status
> Description                              Alarms  IRQ    bpviol CRC4 
> Fra Codi Options  LBO
> Wildcard TDM400P REV I Board 1           OK      0      0      0 
> CAS Unk  YEL      0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1)

This shows alarms on the whole span (the card). The alarms in question
are alarms on specific channels. The whole interface makes more sense in
the other meduims where the span usually corresponds to one physical
meduim.

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755              jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406           mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to