On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 02:14:57AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > http://www.voipon.co.uk/xorcom-astribank32-32-fxs-channel-bank-p-530.html > > > > Trouble is, you'll need 7 32-port units to cover your needs and I'm not > > sure if USB2 is up to driving that many ... Tzafrir? > > One USB connector can take a number close to that easily. But even if > USB were the bottleneck, you would just add another USB controller in > the form of PCI card and get extra bandwidth.
Is there any reason you'd want to do that on a system of that scale instead of just using Ethernetted FXS boxes on a dedicated 100Base? Even if you didn't want to use reinvite, seems you'd still win just from the less expensive host interface (I can't understand people using T-1 interfaces for FXS channels either, honestly, in the current environment). Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274 Those who cast the vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything. -- (Joseph Stalin) _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
