On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 02:14:57AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > > > > http://www.voipon.co.uk/xorcom-astribank32-32-fxs-channel-bank-p-530.html > > > > > > > > Trouble is, you'll need 7 32-port units to cover your needs and I'm > not > > > > sure if USB2 is up to driving that many ... Tzafrir? > > > > > > One USB connector can take a number close to that easily. But even if > > > USB were the bottleneck, you would just add another USB controller in > > > the form of PCI card and get extra bandwidth. > > > > Is there any reason you'd want to do that on a system of that scale > > instead of just using Ethernetted FXS boxes on a dedicated 100Base? > > > > Even if you didn't want to use reinvite, seems you'd still win just > > from the less expensive host interface (I can't understand people using > > T-1 interfaces for FXS channels either, honestly, in the current > > environment). > > > > > > Cheers, > > -- jra > > -- > > Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > > Designer The Things I Think RFC > 2100 > > Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com > '87 e24 > > St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 > 1274 > > > > Those who cast the vote decide nothing. > > Those who count the vote decide everything. > > -- (Joseph Stalin) > > > http://www.quintum.com/enterprise/en_productdetail.html?id=19 > > 48 Port, you cannot go wrong although, you are going to pay a bit, > well worth it. Besides, breaking it down per port makes it a little > more palatable. > > Thanks, > Steve Totaro >
Sorry, wrong link. http://www.quintum.com/enterprise/en_productdetail.html?id=21 _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
