On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Benny Amorsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tilghman Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Oh, please, don't start THAT flame war. People who consider Reply-To > > munging harmful have obviously failed to read the ENTIRE rfc (especially > > the part where it specifically says the use of the Reply-To header is for > > use > > on listservs). :-P > > It's harmful whether an RFC says it is or not. > > > /Benny >
Is RFC 3389 harmful? _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
