On Sunday 06 April 2008 15:56:22 Steve Totaro wrote: > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Benny Amorsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tilghman Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Oh, please, don't start THAT flame war. People who consider Reply-To > > > munging harmful have obviously failed to read the ENTIRE rfc > > > (especially the part where it specifically says the use of the > > > Reply-To header is for use on listservs). :-P > > > > It's harmful whether an RFC says it is or not. > > > > > > /Benny > > Is RFC 3389 harmful?
RFC 3261 is *definitely* harmful. -- Tilghman _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
