On Wednesday 07 May 2008 17:27:33 Atis Lezdins wrote: > So all together - I'm saying there could be really simple interface > for all this - no troubles with locking of lists or keeping persistent > connections. Why would user application need to take care of all this, > if DB engine can do that.
Your question leads to this question: why don't you create a proxy application that listens on AMI and populates a database outside of Asterisk, then do all your queries to that database? That would provide exactly the same functionality, but it would not require a single change to the Asterisk codebase. You could even contribute that application back as something in the "contrib/scripts" subdirectory. -- Tilghman _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
