Tilghman Lesher a écrit : > On Wednesday 07 May 2008 17:27:33 Atis Lezdins wrote: > >> So all together - I'm saying there could be really simple interface >> for all this - no troubles with locking of lists or keeping persistent >> connections. Why would user application need to take care of all this, >> if DB engine can do that. >> > > Your question leads to this question: why don't you create a proxy > application that listens on AMI and populates a database outside of Asterisk, > then do all your queries to that database? That would provide exactly the > same functionality, but it would not require a single change to the Asterisk > codebase. You could even contribute that application back as something > in the "contrib/scripts" subdirectory. > > I second that, If there is already a way to do things, why adding another one, especialy if it's for caching reasons. While we cannot say that asterisk fall into the KISS rule, it's not a reason to let it grow.
-- Benoit Plessis +33 6 77 42 78 32 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +33 4 67 28 06 96 _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
