On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 10:57, Carl A. Cook wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Monday 29 December 2003 11:18 pm, Brian West wrote: > > All good here also.. this has got to be in the to 10 stupidest things > > posted to the mailing list today. > > > > bkw > > Very nice Brian, thanks for the adversarial 'welcome'. > > Is this the kind of treatment I am to expect here? If so, it's not worth it. > > (My DNS is working fine)
The treatment isn't too inappropriate. The exact question you posed could have easily been answered by any number of search patterns in just about every search engine. Even a lame amount of work on your part should have uncovered a mailing list of CVS checkins that usually doesn't goes more than a day between updates. BTW, either your DNS wasn't working, or it was a long time since anyone down your way had pulled that information since a caching name server will hold that data for at least 1 day from the last successful lookup. But this also points to the fact that you could have done at least the minimal effort of having checked to see where the DNS problem was occurring. I know that can be difficult during a outage of sorts, but seeings how your message went to the mail server located near asterisk took some time between hops, you very well could have had problems on your end. Maybe not all encompassing, but problems non the less. Don't expect to be treated well when you ask questions that are easily answered with low effort. For that matter, don't expect to be treated too well when asking questions that are already answered either. If you ask questions that enhance the knowledge of all, you will get respected. No matter what level of expertise a person holds here, we all are here to learn. The archives are available for your perusal. The wiki is a great place where Olle has condensed a lot of the information from the archives into a single place without the extra fluff. > On Tuesday 30 December 2003 06:16 am, Adams, Gavin wrote: > > Stupid as in development stopped, agreed. > > Be advised, that the newest tarball is 4 months old. Can you explain to me what a > normal visitor to the website is supposed to think, when CVS does not resolve and > old tarballs? > > Not sure any more I'm interested in learning this, to put up with reflexive schite. > There's enough crap in the world. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAj/xrngACgkQnQ18+PFcZJtBTACeO2zdE7i8loyEsvBXPbMQ9pcK > BbIAn1tOnD91eynKCO+8rHo0TXsWjH0W > =4cxA > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
