-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thanks, to the two.
But I can't tell you how weary and sick I am of this kind of reflexive criticism. It is -always- counter to true advancement, and burns those delicate few who actually cause progress, in addition to (pitiable) n00bs. I run a small new architecture company, and am a vocal open standards advocate. I'm an academic, a free-thinker, and researcher, and the thought of investing the large amount of effort and time required to learn a new thing in detail isn't a problem; but if it's necessary to join another bummed-out Thunderdome, where countless bloody-minded fukkers are sitting in the bushes waiting to mean-spiritedly bite my ass off whenever I ask a stupid question or have a 'different' idea, I can't spare the resources. On a deeper level, I'm not going to spend my life 'on guard', protecting myself from people sharing/spreading the punishment they've received from the System and the ruling Party. People should identify the -real- source of their frustration, and -fix- it, no matter what it takes... or suffer. That said, I'm trying very hard to swallow this hairball, and investigate asterisk. On Tuesday 30 December 2003 12:16 pm, Steven Critchfield wrote: > The treatment isn't too inappropriate. The exact question you posed > could have easily been answered by any number of search patterns in just > about every search engine. Even a lame amount of work on your part > should have uncovered a mailing list of CVS checkins that usually > doesn't goes more than a day between updates. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAj/x0qEACgkQnQ18+PFcZJuuDQCcD6jMPmnabt0ey/lb8IYVnGgc NEIAn2vKbpG1HVOrhZQozVRc1pgPSa4r =nEL0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
