Thanks both, The only thing I have a little concern over is that 1.6 is that its still a development release (if I understand things correctly). Stability is the main thing for me (its only a very small set up) but there are no technical people around if something were to go wrong through the day.
I shall take another look at both options. Thank you Wayne. Michiel van Baak wrote: > On 08:26, Fri 10 Oct 08, David Gibbons wrote: > >> You need to check out the chan_sccp-b mainling lists on sourceforge. There >> is active development in SVN but not in tarball releases. >> >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=chan-sccp-b-discussion >> >> It is very stable. >> > > Or, if you dont want to use outside modules use Asterisk 1.6 (which has > been released as well) with the chan_skinny driver. > A lot of development went into it and it's much more useable then the > 1.2 version. > Myself uses chan_skinny in production without too much trouble. > Specially when you use the 7960 phones it's a nice setup. > > >> Dave >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne >> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 6:00 PM >> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion >> Subject: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7960 sccp, Skinny and 1.4 >> >> Hi All, >> I'm thinking of creating a new asterisk server using the latest 1.4 >> stable release to replace my ageing Asterisk SVN-branch-1.2-r7231 (its >> been a while!). >> >> My only concern - my phones are Cisco 7960's (with sccp firmware 7.2 >> loaded) and to support them better, I remember compiling in a skinny(?) >> driver to replace the (from what I could tell) basic in built sccp >> support. After digging around a little it would appear that the original >> creator of the skinny driver has not done any development for ages. >> > > What driver are you referring to ? > It must be something outside of the core asterisk, because a lot of > commits went into chan_skinny the last year or so. > > >> Simple question, has 1.4 got better native support for sccp now without >> having to add in anything extra to make everything work ok?, if not, is >> there a version that someone may have carried forward of the skinny >> driver that will work with 1.4? >> > > Yes, chan_skinny in 1.4 is better then the 1.2 version, but the real > stuff happened in the 1.6 version. > > 1.6.0 is released, so why not use that one instead of 1.4? > > >> Thank you, >> Wayne. >> >> > > _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
