2009/1/26 Benoit <[email protected]> > Olivier a écrit : > > Anyway, according your own experience, how frequent is this PTP case ? > I can't say, i don't have any other experience than our own lines > > That's the point : as much as possible, we're trying to avoid any > > re-configuration of legacy equipment. > > > > So, how would you order TE/NT, PtP/PtMP combination starting from the > > most useful (for yourself) to the least one. > > For instance, myself, I would classify them like this : > > 1. TE PtMP (the most needed) > > 2. NT PtMP > > 3. TE PtP > > 4. NT PtP (the least needed) > > As for me it is > 1. TE PtP > 2. NT PtP > 3. TE PtMP > 4. NT PtMP > > At least until i encounter the need of a NT/TE PtMP setup. > > But i don't understand your point, NT/TE PtP and TE PtMP seem to be > already implemented, > i fail to see the use of classify them, since the only missing is NT PtMP
The goal is to provide Matt and Digium with valuable input as thinking "a feature is needed" is one thing, having several people asking for it is another story ... >From Matt's point of view NT PtMP was the least needed ... and so is yours ... Thanks, anyway for telling as at least, it reflects your needs. > > > You want NT PtMP and i second that, > not being limited on the asterisk > side is a must in the > telephony ecosystem, since the legacy PABX aren't alwsys easy to > reconfigure. > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
