On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Alan Lord (News) wrote: > That was quite an interesting set of responses. I didn't get any > impression that there is a strong preference either way.
I asked the same question some time back too... Got a few replies, and now (as then), all my systems are 100% .conf (or dialplan code, whatever you want to call it) John Lees reply did rather irriate me - because he gave no explanation, or justification for it - hence my own terse reply! I have some huge dialplans with 1000's of lines of code in them, but most of it is actually computer generated - as I said in a post some time back: "PHP is my AEL"... I'll code something by hand, then get PHP to generate multiple instances of it, rewriting my extensions.conf file every time. I haven't yet had to resort to AEL or AGI and personally I'm all for keeping the "core" as simple as possible - less code to go wrong and all that. This to me seems OK to me, as once a system is installed, the changes to it are infrequent, and a reload takes a fraction of a second. Good luck with whatever approach you choose! Gordon _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
