Gordon Henderson schrieb: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Alan Lord (News) wrote: > >> That was quite an interesting set of responses. I didn't get any >> impression that there is a strong preference either way. > > I asked the same question some time back too... Got a few replies, and now > (as then), all my systems are 100% .conf (or dialplan code, whatever you > want to call it) > > John Lees reply did rather irriate me - because he gave no explanation, or > justification for it - hence my own terse reply! > > I have some huge dialplans with 1000's of lines of code in them, but most > of it is actually computer generated - as I said in a post some time back: > "PHP is my AEL"... I'll code something by hand, then get PHP to generate > multiple instances of it, rewriting my extensions.conf file every time. > > I haven't yet had to resort to AEL or AGI and personally I'm all for > keeping the "core" as simple as possible - less code to go wrong and all > that. > > This to me seems OK to me, as once a system is installed, the changes to > it are infrequent, and a reload takes a fraction of a second.
So what's so irritating about AEL then? You are using a higher level language to generate extensions.conf as well. Philipp Kempgen -- AMOOCON 2009, May 4-5, Rostock / Germany -> http://www.amoocon.de Asterisk: http://the-asterisk-book.com - http://das-asterisk-buch.de AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied -> http://www.amooma.de Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer, Handelsregister: Neuwied B14998 -- _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
